A reader wrote asking my opinion about tattoos visible on spankers on video. I wrote about tattoos on spankees before way back in 2008 but never on the subject of them appearing on tops.
I think tattoos are fairly commonplace in today’s society and so of course they are going to be commonly sported by bottoms and tops alike. Maybe I’m being presumptuous, but perhaps fetish models are even more likely to have tattoos than the general public.
With spankees, we’d get member comments about girls with tattoos on their lower back, thighs, or right on their bottom cheeks stating that they were distracting during the spanking. Any visible tattoos at all were pointed out as being unfitting on a model playing the role of a young, conservative girl. We don’t get quite as much feedback on this as we used to, probably for any number of reasons – changes in casting, acceptance, etc. But we have recently gotten some feedback about spankers’ tattoos.
There have not been too many, but we have received a few comments stating that large, visible tattoos on a spanker who is playing strict, conservative role is jarring. I can certainly understand this and I have noticed it myself. But as long as the role being acted out is compelling enough, a tattoo on the arm or leg can be easily overlooked. If the spanker’s role is a traditional strict mom or old-fashioned headmistress then full sleeves or face tattoos might be harder to ignore, however.
What is your opinion? Do they interfere with the scene or are they even a big deal these days?