In a recent email exchange, I was chatting about my latest Punished Brats scene, Caught Skipping. My email pen pal pointed out that Veronica didn’t spend much time spanking me over my bikini. I explained that actually the scene was supposed to be a straight to the bare spanking, but that we got so caught up in the moment, Veronica ended up smacking my covered bottom during my intial struggle before she had a chance to yank the swimsuit down. I was a little bummed (ha! No pun intended) only because I’d wanted the spanking to be a true “bare bottom” scene in which the viewer could watch my pale, unmarked bottom begin to turn red with the very first swat.
This brought up the topic of what constitutes a bare bottom spanking. Seems simple enough, right? A spanking on an uncovered behind. But being an overanalytical, fussy creature, I wonder if I could call what I received a bare bottom spanking. Yes, I did end up bare, but I didn’t start out that way. If even a single swat is first administered to a clothed bottom, does that void declaring it a bare bottom spanking or need one only end up naked from the waist down at some point along the way to count? What is your opinion? How do you define the term?
The conversation also sparked the recurring topic of thongs. If a spankee wears a thong and it remains in place throughout the spanking, is that still a bare bottomed spanking since the cheeks are completely uncovered? I can see both sides - the cheeks are bare, but the spankee isn’t truly bared. Argh! My brain hurts. I’m just going to stick to panties (they’re more comfortable to me anyway) and not worry about it, but I’d love to hear your feedback on this point too.
April 23rd, 2009 - 10:19 am
Pixie,
I didn’t know you could stick to panties, I thought panties stuck to the person. Oh well! LOL (Is LOL the right text? I’m getting too old for the new language.)
I consider a spanking to be bare bottom only if it starts out bare from the beginning and thongs must be pulled down or off for it to be bare.
Frank
April 23rd, 2009 - 11:22 am
Hi Pixie,
For me, a bare bottom spanking doesn’t have to start from the very first swat. Panties just have to be lowered at some point, and the majority of spanks administered on the bare. As for thongs, even though the spankee’s cheeks are exposed with them in place, I wouldn’t consider it a bare bottom spanking unless they came down. Thongs certainly have a visual allure, but when it comes to spanking I prefer a woman in a sexy pair of cotton panties.
April 23rd, 2009 - 12:11 pm
Hi Pixie,
Great question, personly for me a bare bottom spanking starts with the spankee,s underwear down no matter what type they are.
Apologies for straying of subject a bit but i would just like to add that onething that spoils a scene fopr me everytime is when it starts or ends with the spankee naked as to me that just isnt realistic.
Rant over.
Thanks Pixie
April 23rd, 2009 - 1:22 pm
hmm good question i have to say it should be bare if it going be bare bottom spanking the spanker would have to either make you the spankeed take down pants short or anything under neath for the bare bottom spanking. or have u take some , clothes off then take down the thong boxer/ breif underwaet them self
what i mean if the spanker said you going get a spanking or a bare bottom spanking then that what it should be nothing else.
iam guessing bare botto spanking help the male or female spankee learn lesson better then a spanking over clothes panties or underwear
April 23rd, 2009 - 1:54 pm
Glass half full / glass half empty / glass the wrong size?
Personally, if a hand makes smart contact with an uncovered bottom then a bare-bottomed spanking has occurred, but there’s no need to get anal about it…
I’ll get my coat
April 23rd, 2009 - 2:09 pm
Pixie, you’re too funny. You ponder things the same way I do.
OK, since you asked — I never thought about it until this minute, but my first reply, before I think about it and change my mind 15 times, is that if the spankee ends up bare bottomed being spanked, then it’s a bare-bottom spanking.
April 23rd, 2009 - 2:14 pm
First off, I would argue that that scene was one of your best to date. Secondly a bare-bottom spanking, to me, is a spanking in which the vast majority is on the bare. A straight-to-bare spanking would be where not one swat is on any clothing.
As for a thong…nope that isn’t a true bare-bottom spanking. Just like you can not call the guy that rides a bicycle with no helmet on the sidewalk at 10 mph a cyclist. It needs to be a truly bare-bottom to count just like a true cyclist must have the proper gear and be on the road.
April 23rd, 2009 - 2:32 pm
An interesting and complicated issue, when you think about it for a while.
In a cold clear light of day style of thinking, any spanking that ends with impact on bare buttocks is a bare bottom spanking, if it started off as a covered spanking or involves a thong that stays on. But there is the psychological side to it. The removal of that last layer of protection (no matter how flimsy it is or even if it is a thong with no protection at all) depending on how or why it is done can represent humiliation, embarrassment or even a ceremonial aspect, in a spanking.
On a side note there is one form of punishment that normally goes straight to bare and very few spankees experience any other form of it, it is, of coarse, punishment on the hands. The various forms of glove that can be used, thin cotton, leather, wool, etc can provide an interesting range of sensations to a hand punishment with strap ruler or cane, it is surprising that few people seem to experiment with this.
Prefectdt
April 23rd, 2009 - 2:43 pm
I couldn’t agree with “Shwarz” any less; When I was a bicycle messenger in San Francisco anyone wearing a helmet would have been laughed off the road yet we did dangerous things that would make even a modern BMX’ers hair turn grey. Likewise, a thong or panties pulled right up the crack exposing both cheeks to the punishment still qualifies as bare bottomed so long as they come down at some point along the way.
April 23rd, 2009 - 3:19 pm
Whether it starts with or without panties…if at the end they are down, in my mind it constitutes a bare-nottom spanking..actually it enhances the moment when they are lowered, either by me or the spankee, thus baring the target so to speak….
April 23rd, 2009 - 3:46 pm
I think that a bare bottomed spanking is one that most of the spanks land on a bare bottom even if you start over clothes first. As for thongs I agree with you I’m sticking to normal underwear as they just aren’t very comfortable.
April 23rd, 2009 - 4:39 pm
I’m right in the mainstream on this one - if a completely bare bottom winds up taking most of the swats, then it’s a bare bottom spanking. Thongs don’t count - bare means unclothed, not just uncovered.
And although I liked the scene, Pixie, I too am sorry that it didn’t work out as you’d planned - watching that flush of pink grow and deepen in color on what were pale white bottom cheeks is one of my favorite things about the whole spanking. All-over tans are not for me - you miss out on one of the best parts that way!
April 23rd, 2009 - 4:57 pm
Yep… I agree with the majority. If the bottom ends up bare, being soundly spanked, it doesn’t matter how it started out…
However, as to the second part of your question, “bare bottom” means EVERYTHING comes down… even the skimpiest of thongs.
Though your idea of starting on the bare, and watching your bottom redden… that’s a lovely idea.
So … let the rosy color fade and start again with a clean slate. Don’t worry… we’ll wait.
April 23rd, 2009 - 7:55 pm
I feel that a bare bottom spanking is one where panties are down and spanks are on the bare skin. It can start over any amount of layers of clothing.
Since the thong is in the middle of the bottom (for modesty sake) and doesn’t impede spanks that fall on bare skin, I feel that it is still a bare bottom spanking as skirt was raised or pants/panties were lowered to get to that ‘thongy’ condition.
I love this latest Pixie’s Previews…….in the Baseball mode, it is a HIT!
April 23rd, 2009 - 9:39 pm
I liked that scene, I especially like watching a scene where it’s really difficult for you to stay still and in position, but you do it anyway.
April 24th, 2009 - 12:23 am
A bare bottom spanking can be either way. Starting out on the bare or starting out over clothing and working down to the bare. A purist might say that a bare bottom spanking is indeed a spanking that starts out and finishes on the bare bottom. Others, not so inclined might say that as long as part of the spanking is on the bare bottom, then it is indeed a bare bottom spanking. So there you have it. Bare is bare.
April 24th, 2009 - 1:43 am
Pixie,
Interesting question!! IMHO A bare bottom spanking is anytime the bottom is finally bared even if it started out fully clothed and progressed to the bare. Pulling down a thong does nothing to increase the sting and only increases the embarresment … AND the view. (lol)
This made me think of other terms and their definitions.
If a Paddle is used should it be called a spanking or a paddling? If a switch is used,is it not a switching? What constitutes a whipping over a spanking?
And how many swats, hits, spanks(?) have to occur before it is a spanking and not just a spank or spanks? If a person gives me a really hard single smack with their hand as I’m standing fully clothed (or even all or partially nude) have I been spanked or just smacked/swatted?
Terminology we use is important to define because if I attend a party and someone I never met says he is going to spank me, I’d like to know what to expect. (Well, NOT that I wouldn’t have ANY idea .. LOL)
Inquiring minds want to know?
Linde
April 24th, 2009 - 3:23 am
Everyone’s opinion may be different, but mine is if there are 50 spanks given, at LEAST 26 of them (more than half) must be on the bare to be considered a bare-bottomed spanking. And by bare-bottomed I mean no clothing present.
April 24th, 2009 - 4:00 am
Hi Pixie,
To me - as a spanking purist as Rosaleen Young used to call me - it’s simple. A bare bottom spanking starts straight to the BARE bottom. No panties, nothing, no nothing but a pair of pale white bum cheeks.
In the fifties or sixties you got it either over your panties or BARE. And BARE meant exactly what it says.
Personally I like that best. The naughty girl yanked across the knee, skirt flipped up, panties down and Whack, Smack, Whack, Smack.. Left, Right, Left, Right… W o n d e r f u l …
I love to see the buttocks redden and to listen to that unmistakable sound a spanking with a bare hand on a bare bottom makes…
So stop tormenting yourself, but give us a lot of “Straight to the bare, over the knee hand spankings..!!!”
:-) 
Hugs and kisses, Funbun
April 24th, 2009 - 4:07 am
What an interesting question Pixie…..but I think that strictly speaking a bare bottom spanking has to be just that……bare from the word go with no clothing whatsoever…..no panties or thongs or knickers anywhere near the lady’s bottom. Otherwise it is an ‘over the skirt’ spanking or an ‘over panties’ spanking which eventually becomes a bare bottom spanking!
With my two ladies I invariably give them bare bottom spankings……each lady’s bottom is bare from the word go……for precisely the reason you talk about in your blog……I love to see their pale, unmarked but naughty cheeks before the punishment begins and even more I enjoy watching those pale, naughty cheeks turning pink and then red. Watching my ladies’ backsides redden under my hand is a great joy!!
Aristotle
April 24th, 2009 - 5:17 am
I do see the distinction between the two, but I still say, if I end up getting spanked on the bare (which is, um, pretty much always) it’s still a bare-bottomed spanking!
April 24th, 2009 - 5:42 am
I don’t really see the distinction, either. If there is nothing between the implement or hand but pale glutial skin, then it is indeed a barebottomed spanking.
It’s kind of like an airplane landing without landing gear.
GE
April 24th, 2009 - 7:14 am
To qualify for the description bare, all strokes must be applied to the uncovered cheeks. Thongs must be removed as an exposed and open bum crack adds to the humiliation of the punishment. In the case of caning it also aids stroke placement because it is easier to identify the meatiest part of the bottom. Most importantly of all, it pleases me to see well spread cheeks reveal their secrets. I regard failure to adopt this posture as resistance and my senior cane is then kept very busy.
April 24th, 2009 - 1:18 pm
Excellent questions, Pixie. I’d say any number of spanks on a bare bottom constitutes a bare bottom spanking. I really don’t know what else it could be called. If your bare bottom is getting spanked during a spanking… what is that, if it’s not a bare bottom spanking?
Do think though that there is a difference between a spanking that starts off over clothing and ends up “bare bottom”… and one that is bare bottom from the very start.
To me, a “bare bottom only spanking” has a more serious and less playful tone to it. There is no hint of a warm-up (especially true if a spanking starts off over pants/dress and panties) and no pretense that the spanking might not progress to bare. It’s a ‘get down to brass tacks’ kind of statement.
Not that a bare bottom only spanking can’t be fun or playful, because it most certainly can. It does seem more ominous though. That any hope for something *lightly* playful is flying out the window as panties are being pulled down.
I realize there is something to be said for removing clothing during a spanking, and I certainly do enjoy that from time to time. But all in all, I usually prefer to build on those pre-spanking butterflies by making it clear… “you’re getting a spanking, it’s going to be on your bare bottom, and it’s going to hurt”… and then drive those points home by starting on the bare. Creates better focus too, I think (less thought about when/if it will be bare bottom time).
And certainly, if its a real discipline spanking… it’s going to always start on the bare bottom.
There really isn’t a quick or universal phrase for a “bare bottom only spanking” though, at least not that I’m aware of… and there really should be, because like you… I do see a difference.
As for thongs… I’m just not a fan of them, and I certainly wouldn’t call a spanking over a thong that was never removed a “bare bottom spanking.” That’s a *spanking over a thong*, nothing more - nothing less. lol… rules is rules!
Todd (and Suzy)
April 24th, 2009 - 4:13 pm
As I recall, the expression ‘bare-bottom spanking’ is shorthand for, “you’re going to get spanked on your bare bottom.” Nothing terribly definitive there but, in all the many threats I witnessed growing up, the impression came through loud and clear that it was to be a spanking on the bare bottom right from the start. The fair number that I actually observed bore that impression out as the hapless child was bared in front of his or her playmates and spanked into a blubbering mess (I’m sure the humiliation added considerably to the result). Of course, there were times when the mother would herd the child inside to their doom with a number of swats or even hard smacks to the seat of the pants or back of or under the dress. Somehow those little “warm-ups” didn’t count when it came time for the actual spanking, which we could often hear through an open door or window, as the unmistakable sound of bare skin being smacked repeatedly broke over us like waves. In sum, it could legitimately go either way but my “programming” favors an interpretation of “straight-to-the-bare” (a more precise expression in itself).
As for thongs, the less I see of them in spanking scenes (or anywhere else) the happier I am, but the “bottom” is the *entire* bottom, not just bare cheeks.
Linde: Y’all knows that heah in thuh Sowth a switchin,’ or even a spankin,’ is often called a whippin’ – at least in the Old South I grew up in (then electricity changed everything ;)).
April 24th, 2009 - 5:33 pm
For me it depends on the circumstace. In the scene above, Pixie was not sentenced to a spanking, she was grabbed and taken to be spanked. A couple of swats to her bikini bottoms, and then down they came.
Then there is being sentenced to a barebottom spanking. Show up at 7. Undies down and spanking ensues.
April 24th, 2009 - 8:04 pm
For me, a bare bottom spanking happens whenever the bottom is bared. It doesn’t have to start that way. BTW, thongs are interesting and some people really like them. But, I really, really dont! Even as a top, it’s awkward. What reason do you give for taking them down when the spankee’s behind is already bared?
April 24th, 2009 - 10:31 pm
If what everyone seems to be saying is true then all the spankings on pb are bare bottom spankings. Off the subject a bit, but I’ve read in some blogs that it’s not considered a spanking if it never gets to the bare. What about that?
April 25th, 2009 - 1:55 am
“The Spanking Candidate from Minnesota casts his vote with the majority”
In other words, once the panties are pulled down, it becomes a bare-bottom spanking, regardless of what state of dress or undress preceded it. A spanking that started off over a skirt, then on to the seat of the panties, and then ended on the bare–well, it sounds like a lot of fun, is what it is, but the finish was a bare-bottom spanking, and the rest was just warm-up!
I have nothing against thongs–and at spanking parties, they’re great, since it leaves the majority of the spanking surface bare and easily accesible while giving the wearer at least a modicum of modesty–but even so, if they don’t get pulled down, then the bottom is never truly “bare” and therefore doesn’t qualify as a “bare-bottom spanking”.
Hugs,
the very long-winded Dr. Ken
April 25th, 2009 - 5:41 am
I can’t agree with Dr Ken. What matters is whether the spanking hand or implement, connects with the unprotected flesh: that is what makes a bare-bottom spanking. So if those ghastly thongs are worn, they do not need to come off in order to make a bare-bottom: removing them only serves to humiliate the spankee a little more than being spanked does anyway, or to give an extra thrill to the spanker!
If a spanking begins over clothing and gradually becomes bare (which can be a delight to view - there is something special about a skirt being flipped up and then panties pulled down) it may be warm up: or it may be a real and severe part of the spanking: let’s face it there is litle protection in a pair of panties, especially when attacked by an experienced and hard hand or, for instance, a brush, wooden spoon or cane.
It appears I am in a minority on this - but I stand my ground!
April 25th, 2009 - 7:43 am
Another comment on THONGS!!
If I was to wear a thong (which I don’t) and I was spanked but the thong wasn’t pulled down, AND I was told “At least it wasn’t a bare bottom spanking”
Would that make sense? (Or be fair … lol)
^mike: I knows what a whipin,switchin and spankin is but down here in phlorida (not really the south) they seem to think a single smack on a well padded bottom is one of the above and I don’t think so.
Linde
April 25th, 2009 - 8:16 am
Hi Pixie
What is a bare bottom spanking? Hard to say.I was raised in a very large orphanage for 10 years so I seen alot of spankings. Spankings were the number one punishment Ill try an tell how it was. If you started with clothes on you ended with clothes on, Start with the paddle end with the paddle.There were no OTK spankings to personal no hand spankings to personal They were a little harder but only 20 to 35 swats. There was some begging, but what is a bare bottom spanking Id have to say both its on how you look at is. Pixie you have a good day an have fun in the woods.. Bye Bye Ed
April 25th, 2009 - 10:15 am
Pixie nice post ,if the spankees bottom is bared to be spanked the spanks will be on the girls bare bottie lol. thongs will be taken down as well for a spankee for daring to wear them lots of love and spanks , ive been catching up Pixie with the vids ,nice to see Bev again ,tim xxx
April 25th, 2009 - 6:03 pm
Hi Pixie!
Anytime a bottom is bared during a spanking, then it’s a bare-bottom spanking as far as I’m concerned, even if that means only a single swat is administered to naked skin.
As for thongs, wearing one provides no protection during the spanking, making such chastisement a bare-bottom event, with one exception: without being overly graphic, the spankee’s genitals are, indeed, covered when a thong is worn. Between intimate partners or good friends, wearing the thong may be an unnecessary formality, but between acquaintances, the added coverage may add a small degree of comfort to the spankee so that everything is not hanging out, so to speak.
My preference is and has always been for a bare-bottom spanking. I know that some enjoy the added suspense, drama, and anticipation that pealing layers of clothing can create, and in some circumstances such pealing does add to the erotic nature of the scene, but after we become accustomed to giving and receiving spankings with our partner and various playmates, I prefer to simply get down to business. But I like the idea of having a conversation while swats are being delivered or received; it’s a convenient way to catch up on the day’s events while receiving/giving intense pleasure, or to comment on the spanking itself.
April 25th, 2009 - 9:41 pm
i say if its a true bare bottom spanking,then thats the way it should be from the very start to finish. if you start over any clothing at all,it is just a spanking,until you bare the bottom,then it becomes bare bottom spanking.its just that simple.
April 26th, 2009 - 9:41 am
(Sorry this is my third post on this topic)
I’m amazed at how many different opinions there are on this topic!!!
In real life, I think if a spanking was going to be bare bottom it STARTED out completely on the bare bottom from the start. Only in films and videos is there a progression to the bare. And in real life, I don’t think “warm ups” are given. If punishment is the intent, then there is no desire to allow the person to get used to the intensifying spanks. NO change or progression of impliments either!!
(sorry this is my last post …lol)
Linde
April 26th, 2009 - 10:57 am
Hi Pixie,
I think, that a “bare bottom spanking” is when the spanking ends updelivering swats on the bare bottom, and most of the time of spanking is on the bare. From psychological side a bottom must be fully unclothed - so a thong should be lowered or taken off too.
Yet I would like to add something. In disciplinary films, a spankee should not be fully naked - it is very unrealistic. There are two ways: either the spankee takes off everything below the waist (especially if she wears pants/jeans), or the spanker lifts up her skirt and lowers down her panties. It looks unrealistic if a spanker start spanking over the jeans and then asks the spankee to take them off.
Personally I prefer when a girl wears a short skirt and usual white cotton panties. Then a spanker can start with spanking over the skirt, then lift her skirt up and spank over the panties and finally lower down them and spank on the bare bottom (spanking on the bare should last much more than previous two parts).
Regards, Alex
April 26th, 2009 - 1:06 pm
Pixie I would like to finish about the spanking in the orphanage. To many eyes yesterday. The girls or boys were never spanked in front of each other youll see why. 90% of the time you were naked in front of about 30 kids that was in your dorm. After the spanking you were in the corner so everyone could see you red bottom an sometimes see your bottom turn black an blue. I dont recall seeing any one kicking there legs or yelling, I think today thats for show I dont want you to think they went around with a paddle in there hand all the but there were so many kids. The eyes are back Bye Bye Ed
April 26th, 2009 - 1:52 pm
I have a belief about what we do. Spanking between adults is a power exchange. The bottom submits their bottom to punishment to the top. When one bares the bottom , the person about to be spanked is vulnerable in a unique way. This must be done with trust and respect. In other words, the one being spanked gives you the gift of her bottom, and the top accepts this with respect and care.
April 26th, 2009 - 2:35 pm
Pixie,
For my $0.02: Per your original statement, a bare-bottomed spanking is applied to a bare bottom. Not a bottom with a piece of cloth (even a tiny one) between the cheeks. That may be a “bare buns” spanking or a “bare cheek” spanking, but it’s not a “bare bottom” spanking.
As far as how it begins, if it starts over a clothed bottom and then the bottom is bared, I would only consider the part after the baring to be a “bare bottom” spanking. Perhaps to be thought of as two closely connected spankings, one of which is a “bare bottom spanking” {grin}
Mark
April 26th, 2009 - 4:23 pm
Hmm. Again you pose a most interesting question.
But I think a bare bottom spanking should be just that. A bare bottom spanking. And it can be great fun to proceed over clothing and then get down to it (lol), especially when the spankee tries to get out of baring themselves completely. Even thongs and G-strings must come down to be a real bare bottom spanking because I think it’s just that much more intimate and may be a teensy bit more embarrassing for the spankee as all their charms are displayed. Plus you can then progress to some initimate spanking of some more ’specialized’ areas.
April 27th, 2009 - 2:46 pm
I also like to see the first spanks on the bare. Way I see it, when the bottom isn’t bare, it isn’t a bare bottom spanking, and when it is…it is. So maybe only part of the spanking is a bare bottom spanking, or bare-bottomed spanking…sometimes people add the “ed”, which I also like.
I think we need more terms for more situations. A “straight-to-bare spanking” is good. I’d prefer no thong, but I consider a spanking on bare skin to be a bare bottom spanking, and I respect whatever the situation calls for. Maybe we could call the no-thong variety a bared-naked spanking? Or does that imply completely nude? Nudity can be an important psychological aspect of a spanking, so a thong or any covering to any part of the body is something to consider. I like completely bare from the waist down best.
April 27th, 2009 - 3:31 pm
Wow!! What a great discussion with so many intriguing and often diametrically opposed viewpoints! Although I don’t think I’m much closer to figuring out how to define bare in my own mind, I absolutely loved reading your contributions and I hope you’ll continue to share your opinions on this post. You raised so many interesting points, that I will most definitely have to do a follow up in the near future based on some of the new questions you’ve raised.
April 28th, 2009 - 5:27 pm
Pixie, what a great question.
To me, a spanking is a bare bottom spanking if the spankee’s bottom is bare for the majority of the spanking. I can’t believe I’m getting into percentages here, but….
If the last two or three swats were bare, I wouldn’t consider that a bare bottom spanking. But if the early swats were over clothing, and then the majority of the spanking was hand to stinging bottom, I’d consider that a bare bottom spanking.
I think it’s unlikely for only a few spanks to be on the bare bottom. Seems to me that once a spanker has bared my bottom, the spanking intensifies and goes on and on. lol.
Occasionally, I like the feeling of my panties being whisked down and the spanking beginning, quickly, in earnest. But usually, I like the gradual approach because I like - when possible - lengthy spankings, and I’ve found that gradual baring and a long warm-up usually equals a longer spanking and a higher intensity.
I’d feel cheated if all my spanking started off bare. I love the flip my tummy does as each layer is taken down. And I like not knowing when and how it will happen. As the spanker takes control of my bottom, my submissiveness grows.
There’s really no easy answers to this thing we do, so many different likes, dislikes, experiences.
As far as thongs: I’ve worn thongs at clubs and parties because I’ve played with strangers or people I don’t know very well, and I don’t want to go bare.
Physically, it sure feels like a bare bottom spanking because my cheeks and thighs are fully exposed. But, psychologically, the thong makes a difference. It doesn’t seem like a bare bottom spanking unless the spanker has taken hold of my panties and either peeled or pulled them down.
No easy answers here. lol.
April 28th, 2009 - 8:43 pm
I have spanked alot of women in my lifetime and although they didn’t all start out barebottom, they always ended that way.I personally feel that whether you start out with yuor panties up and then get them pulled down after afew spanks, it is still a bare bottom spanking.I prefer to spank a bare bottom and when I spank a young lady, nine times out of ten it will start out on the bare unless she prefers that I don’t and then I would respect her wishes but most of the ladies I have spanked over the years wanted it on the bare bottom from the start.So as I stated, I feel if the spanking ends up bare bottom it would be considered a bare bottom spanking.
May 5th, 2009 - 6:29 pm
Pixie,
I think that a bare bottom spanking is one that the majority of the spanking is given on the bare. Whether it starts out over clothing I don’t think really matters. Should thongs be removed? Hmmmmmm, it is funny how I knew how I felt about both of these issues until I started reading everyone else’s responses. I think I would agree with Sandy that it definitely still feels like a bare bottomed spanking because a thong definitely does not provide any protection, but I think for it to be a “legitimate” bare bottom spanking that the thong should be lowered also.
Interesting question. I would never have thought there could be so many different views on it.
May 6th, 2009 - 2:34 pm
here in UK we talk about a ‘3 stager’
starts over skirt/dress
then that is lifted up for more swats over knickers(panties to you guys in the US)
then they come down for the bare bottom bit!
May 8th, 2009 - 2:41 pm
[…] with a few tricky questions about spanking terms that were raised by Linde in response to the Defining Bare […]
May 9th, 2009 - 10:12 pm
IHMO, a bare-bottom spanking is one that only needs to end with the naughty one (like you) pixie, my dear, lol having panties down. it need not start bare. also, I think thons may be left up to be considered as bare-bottomed. of course, I believe that all spankings should be ended up bare, including sensuous, or “play” spankings. P.S. just kidding about you being naughty, as you are probably not always naughty
May 11th, 2009 - 7:16 pm
To me a bare bottom spanking happens when I’m stark naked and positioned in such a way that genitalia and anus are completely exposed. The humilation factor creates for me a feeling of being bare emotionally. When Im bare from corner time, It breaks me down emotionally.
June 2nd, 2009 - 5:32 pm
A bare bottom spanking is more humiliating than with a thong. With the thong all that is bared is the butt. When the thong comes down everthing is bared. The girl being spanked is further humiliated by knowing that anyone watching may see everything especially if she is standing , bent over a chair, or when she gets on/off her spanker’s lap. In an OTK spanking where her feet are off the floor she has to try to keep her legs together while being spanked. Further humiliation can occur if instead of pulling her panties down she is naked below the waist or totally naked.
My fantasy is a naked girl being spanked by a fully clothed guy with a group of people lokking on and laughing. After he finishes she gets spanked again by each person in the room.
September 9th, 2009 - 9:46 am
To my way of thinking, A bare bottom is a bare bottom
most scenario’s of bare bottom spankings/canings begin in various background of place. I.E Kitchen, sitting room, bedroom, bathroom, school room, principal’s office, place of work, secretary’s in office’s etc etc. The only possible place where a bare bottom spanking from beginning to end would be the bathroom or bedroom. all the other locations means undressing has to take place before the bare bottom is exposed. in quite a number of scenario’s the undressing plays a big part. otk, skirt whacked, then raised whacked on panties, then the real spanking takes place on the bare already chastised cheeks. touching one’s toes, over the back of a chair all likewise the undressing leads to the bare bottom being thouroughly spanked/caned/hairbrushed
slippered etc. etc. The exposed culprit is in tears, humilated by being exposer from the waste down etc being shamed is a big part of undressing the naughty girl. getting it over and done with is the best for most girls and indeed boys. So being bare for the first whack to the last is much preferred by most. A bare bottom is a bare bottom. one could ask, waht is the deffinition of spanking. etc etc.